From the Globe and Mail :
"Addressing the Canadian House of Commons yesterday, Australian PM John Howard described the US as a "remarkable and powerful force for good in the world," adding that Canada, Australia and other nations should deeply appreciate "the decency and hope that the power and purpose of the United States represents to the world."
He referred directly to the previous Liberal government's opposition to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq"
Oh yeah, Canada is sure sorry about missing the boat on Iraq.
What were we thinking?
And weren't you the little prick who publicly claimed to have seen the US evidence of WMDs in Iraq?
And from NaPo : "As for those massive uranium reserves shared by Canada and Australia, Howard warned that a proposed Global Nuclear Energy Partnership - while "laudably" seeking to curb nuclear proliferation - must not "work against the interests of countries such as Canada and Australia." "
By "interests", Howard presumably meant the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, where he later went for dinner.
Harper greeted Howard with full military honours.
This is the way we always greet those heads of state who are very big on war now but who previously declined to serve in the Viet Nam War when they had the chance.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(286)
-
▼
May
(28)
- The pope does Auschwitz
- It isn't a war, so the rules of war don't apply
- Day on Da Vinci
- Twas brillig, but for slithy Toews
- Toews Town Hall
- Close your eyes...ok, now imagine they're poor.
- The Accountability Act and throwing babies out of ...
- Iran eyes transparent badges for atheists
- Focus on the fetus as a "protection" racket
- Oh just stay dead already!
- The Certificate of Hitlertude
- Are we done with this yet?
- Guerilla gardening
- Chickenhawk Howard
- Harper's New Public Appointments Commission
- Grover Norquist in his bathtub
- Maurice Vellacott - unplugged
- Error message
- What a difference a Day makes
- Conflict resolution is...
- Dave's Random Gibberish
- Accountability
- May Poll
- The return of the Krarks
- Pensions and landmines
- The Media is the Massage
- Iraq Good, Canada Bad
- May Day
-
▼
May
(28)
- 404 System Error
- A Creative Revolution
- Accidental Deliberations
- Another Voice
- April Reign
- Back of the Book
- Big City Lib
- Bilateralist
- Birth Pangs
- Blogging Change
- Bowen Island Journal
- Bread and Roses
- Broadsides
- CREEKSIDE - THE SPP POSTS
- Canadian Cynic
- Canadian Progressive Voices
- CathiefromCanada
- Challenging the Commonplace
- Council of Canadians
- Cracked Crystal Ball
- Crawl Across the Ocean
- DAMMIT JANET!
- Dawg's Blawg
- De Koboldorum Rebus
- Dymaxion World
- Harper Valley
- Impolitical
- In-Sights
- Just Another Willy Loman
- Laila Yuile
- Leftist Jab
- Let Freedom Rain
- Liberal Catnip
- Mirabile Dictu
- Montreal Simon
- Moved to Vancouver
- Murray Dobbin
- Northern Insights
- Of Gods & Other Monsters
- Open Parliament
- Orwell's Bastard
- POGGE
- Paying Attention
- Politics 'n Poetry
- Public Eye Online
- Pushed to the Left and Loving It
- Q at North of Center
- Red Tory
- Resettle THIS!
- Rose's Place
- Runesmith's Canadian Content
- Rusty Idols
- Stageleft
- Steve & Sandra Toons
- Terrible Depths
- The Black Ewe
- The Dominion
- The Galloping Beaver
- The Gazetteer
- The Regina Mom
- The Sixth Estate
- The Tyee
- The Woodshed
- TheLedgeTrials
- They Call Me "Mr. Sinister"
- Thinking Aboot
- Thwap's Schoolyard
- Trapped in a Whirlpool
- Unrepentant Old Hippie
- Youngfox Canada
- bastard.logic
- hairy fish nuts
4 comments:
ya, now there's no draft, they're past age anyways. that's why the dems put a draft in place from the outset to activate conscription...too many rebuplican congress and senate have kids of age...so it never passed.
maybe the opposition here should do that, save that haper's dumb enough to go for it at the urging of bush. howard's probably dumb enough too.
i understand what you're saying here, but please acknowledge that it is possible to be in support of one war but not another.
I must be very slow, and a tad naive. I thought Canada was going to Afghanistan for a peacekeeping and country rebuilding mission. When did it become a war? Maybe I read other said ... wrong but what other war is there. Let's see - the war on terror - nope we didn't join Bush on that one in Iraq. The US war against the Taliban? not sure about that one. someone please educate me.
i understand what you're saying here, but please acknowledge that it is possible to be in support of one war but not another.
other : You're quite right but Howard supported both wars.
I'll even go you one better. It's also possible to support a war while knowing you would make a crappy soldier in it. Possible too to support the objectives of a particular war while personally remaining a pacifist.
Either position however denies you the right to cheerlead the participation of others as Howard does.
slowgirl : I think "other" is referring to my criticism of Howard for declining Viet Nam but cheerleading Iraq.
Post a Comment