aka the occupation of Afghanistan, aka "The Mission", will be extended for another two years to 2011.
As expected it was the ConservaLiberals vs the NDP and the Bloc by a vote of 198 to 77. Only one lone Liberal, Newfoundland MP Bill Matthews, and Blair Wilson, the Sea-to-Sky Lib MP currently sitting as an Independent, showed up to vote against it.
20 Libs were absent.
An NDP amendment seeking a diplomatic solution for immediate withdrawal was defeated 244 to 30 just prior to the vote.
Well at least attendence was up this time round and more MPs came to the debate.
Flashback to the Great Parliamentary Afghanistan Debate of 2006. : In April 2006, out of a possible attendance of 308, there were 58 Conservative MPs dropping to 14 after O'Connor finished speaking; 21 Liberals dropping to 10; 2 Bloc Quebecois; and 8 NDP rising to 20.
Yesterday Defence Minister Peter MacKay said the vote "demonstrates that our democracy works", while Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier said Prime Minister Stephen Harper will have a stronger mandate to push allied countries at a NATO meeting in Bucharest, Romania, early next month.
Well done, CAE Inc., General Dynamics Canada, SNC-Lavalin, Bell Helicopter Textron, Bombardier, and of course, ConservaLiberals. See you for another warbiz renewal vote in 2010!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(356)
-
▼
March
(26)
- The pandas of soft fascism
- The Liberals have left the building...
- Manley : "Winning the hearts and minds"
- Flash Gordo and Pacific Spirit Park
- Steve and Sandra send in the drones
- SPP and the Canada-Israel "border" update
- I can has cheezburger removr?
- Chocolate Theology 101
- IOC goes for the gold in the Darfur and Tibet events
- SPP and the Environmental Pro-business Agency
- Bear Naked Stearns
- Polls vs pols, deep integration edition
- A protest of olympian proportions
- Globe and Mail deep integration poll 1
- "Operation Enduring Freedom"
- Harper's one-man band
- SPP : Selling sovereignty for profit
- Happy International Women's Day
- Steve and Sandra and the $1M question
- SPP : TOPOFF 5 and the 2010 Olympics
- SoCon or Busted
- Go to a party or defend women's rights....hmmmm
- Malalai Joya...
- Non-proportional representation, Alberta -style
- A wide variety of "No comments"
- Canadian Gothic : McVety and Day
-
▼
March
(26)
- 404 System Error
- A Creative Revolution
- Accidental Deliberations
- Another Voice
- April Reign
- Back of the Book
- Big City Lib
- Bilateralist
- Birth Pangs
- Blogging Change
- Bowen Island Journal
- Bread and Roses
- Broadsides
- CREEKSIDE - THE SPP POSTS
- Canadian Cynic
- Canadian Progressive Voices
- CathiefromCanada
- Challenging the Commonplace
- Council of Canadians
- Cracked Crystal Ball
- Crawl Across the Ocean
- DAMMIT JANET!
- Dawg's Blawg
- De Koboldorum Rebus
- Dymaxion World
- Harper Valley
- Impolitical
- In-Sights
- Just Another Willy Loman
- Laila Yuile
- Leftist Jab
- Let Freedom Rain
- Liberal Catnip
- Mirabile Dictu
- Montreal Simon
- Moved to Vancouver
- Murray Dobbin
- Northern Insights
- Of Gods & Other Monsters
- Open Parliament
- Orwell's Bastard
- POGGE
- Paying Attention
- Politics 'n Poetry
- Public Eye Online
- Pushed to the Left and Loving It
- Q at North of Center
- Red Tory
- Resettle THIS!
- Rose's Place
- Runesmith's Canadian Content
- Rusty Idols
- Stageleft
- Steve & Sandra Toons
- Terrible Depths
- The Black Ewe
- The Dominion
- The Galloping Beaver
- The Gazetteer
- The Regina Mom
- The Sixth Estate
- The Tyee
- The Woodshed
- TheLedgeTrials
- They Call Me "Mr. Sinister"
- Thinking Aboot
- Thwap's Schoolyard
- Trapped in a Whirlpool
- Unrepentant Old Hippie
- Youngfox Canada
- bastard.logic
- hairy fish nuts
2 comments:
It's exciting to see how well Canadian elected officials have accepted US politicians' actions.
Follow the money trail from the military/industrial complex to discover the real power brokers in government.
Good job, gang . . . .
"Well at least attendence was up this time round and more MPs came to the debate."
I'm not so sure this is a positive thing Alison. After all, could it not be construed as the skittish Pols reading the tea leaves and deciding that they no longer have to worry about their constituents holding them to account if an untenable occupation were to ultimately result from such a decision?
Post a Comment