India enews reported on July 12 2006 ...July 12... that Hezbollah announced they had captured two Israeli soldiers attempting to infiltrate the town of Aitaa al-Chaab inside the Lebanese border.
Evidently they were hoping to trade the Israeli soldiers for three Lebanese prisoners held in Israel.
"We are now counting on Hezbollah to strike a deal to get my brother and other prisoners released."
If this is true.......good grief.
Am I the only one who missed this?
Update : From AP
"A senior Hezbollah official said Tuesday the guerrillas did not expect Israel to react with an all-out offensive after the capture of two soldiers" ...
"The truth is — let me say this clearly — we didn't even expect (this) response ... that (Israel) would exploit this operation for this big war against us," said Komati.
He said Hezbollah had expected "the usual, limited response" from Israel after the two soldiers were seized by guerrillas on Israel's side of the border on July 12.
Komati said his group had anticipated negotiations to swap the Israeli soldiers for three Lebanese held in Israeli jails, with Germany acting as a mediator as it has in past prisoner exchanges."
Bold above mine.
Note that while the article says "on Israel's side of the border", this is not in quotes from Kamati.
And if you look at a map, Aitaa al-Chaab is definitely in Lebanon.
Either way, this provides some corroboration of the India News article, namely that the Israeli soldiers were captured with the intent of trading them for the three Lebanese also mentioned in the India News article.
And that Hezbollah only expected "the usual limited response".
Update#2, Tuesday : Joshua Frank at antiwar.com is now on this with more corroborating evidence, including an on-the-ground report dated July 15 that states Israel had not yet come back to Aitaa al-Chaab to pick up the Israeli soldiers' tank. He ends with this :
"Israel didn't need the truth of the matter to play out before it invaded Lebanon. As with the United States' illegitimate invasion of Iraq, Israel just needed the proper media cover to wage a war with no genuine moral impetus."
Update#3, Friday : Dave at Galloping Beaver puts it all together.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(286)
-
▼
July
(21)
- Deeply regret...omelet...eggs
- Middle East Infographic - updated version
- A matter of judgment
- And the other shoe drops
- It's like a whole bunch of tubes, see...
- Kidnapped?...or captured inside Lebanon
- Mr MacKay, your order is ready for pick-up
- A four-tier Canadian passport system
- Looks like Steve had it right after all
- Zoe takes a taxi to Syria
- The Five Ring Circus
- Measuring the inevitable
- The Kings do "This is Spinal Tap"
- "A danger to society"
- Energy security and prosperity pardnership
- 7-Q!da rOxxOrs!
- The far side of crazy
- What is it they say about guys who wear huge belt ...
- "Happy birthday, Mr Resident"
- Gravy train spotting
- Extra soft and super absorbent
-
▼
July
(21)
- 404 System Error
- A Creative Revolution
- Accidental Deliberations
- Another Voice
- April Reign
- Back of the Book
- Big City Lib
- Bilateralist
- Birth Pangs
- Blogging Change
- Bowen Island Journal
- Bread and Roses
- Broadsides
- CREEKSIDE - THE SPP POSTS
- Canadian Cynic
- Canadian Progressive Voices
- CathiefromCanada
- Challenging the Commonplace
- Council of Canadians
- Cracked Crystal Ball
- Crawl Across the Ocean
- DAMMIT JANET!
- Dawg's Blawg
- De Koboldorum Rebus
- Dymaxion World
- Harper Valley
- Impolitical
- In-Sights
- Just Another Willy Loman
- Laila Yuile
- Leftist Jab
- Let Freedom Rain
- Liberal Catnip
- Mirabile Dictu
- Montreal Simon
- Moved to Vancouver
- Murray Dobbin
- Northern Insights
- Of Gods & Other Monsters
- Open Parliament
- Orwell's Bastard
- POGGE
- Paying Attention
- Politics 'n Poetry
- Public Eye Online
- Pushed to the Left and Loving It
- Q at North of Center
- Red Tory
- Resettle THIS!
- Rose's Place
- Runesmith's Canadian Content
- Rusty Idols
- Stageleft
- Steve & Sandra Toons
- Terrible Depths
- The Black Ewe
- The Dominion
- The Galloping Beaver
- The Gazetteer
- The Regina Mom
- The Sixth Estate
- The Tyee
- The Woodshed
- TheLedgeTrials
- They Call Me "Mr. Sinister"
- Thinking Aboot
- Thwap's Schoolyard
- Trapped in a Whirlpool
- Unrepentant Old Hippie
- Youngfox Canada
- bastard.logic
- hairy fish nuts
8 comments:
The first casualty of war. It's all pretext anyway. It wouldn't surprise me. There's also an established tradition of prisoner exchange over this outrageous destruction. Capture is the proper word here.
This is a new one to me. I'm going hunting for a little more info.
Way to go, girl.
I'm proud of you.
I think the difference can be explained as:
If the Israeli soldiers had been taken by official Lebanese troops in Lebanon, then it would be 'captured'.
If the soldiers are taken by Hezbollah, who are clearly NOT forces of the Lebanese government, then it is 'kidnapped'.
Hezbollah are private citizens and have no more right to detain and hold other people (without turning them over to the state) than you or I do.
Unless this is a backdoor argument to claim that Hezbollah are agents of the Lebanese government, which would give Israel legitimacy for their bombs; somewhere I don't think you want to go.
Deanna : I hadn't considered that.
Thank you.
I don't know enough about this subject to debate you on it.It does seem to me to pose some difficult legal problems, given that Hezbolla is part government with sitting members, part revolutionary army, and part social fabric.
My concern here was mainly that the official story suddenly changed in a way that obscured its roots.
Huh?
Deanna : A further thought on that.
Here's what little I've figured out so far:
Nazrallah claims to have stated his intention "to government officials" to kidnap Israeli soldiers in order to do a prisoner exchange.
He claims that "these officials" didn't counsel him not to, so he took that to be one of those "green lights" that are going around lately.
The two Indian and Pakistani papers that covered this tell the same story about 6 Israelis killed and 2 taken prisoner along with their tank inside Lebanon "by Hezbollah forces".
From that point on, all mention of moving the prisoners, talking to media, or attempting to negotiate a prisoner exchange with the Israelis refer not to "Hezbollah" but to "the Lebanese police".
Of course I'm relying here on newspaper reports that I have no way of checking out myself, but if we suppose them to be accurate and Hezbollah captured soldiers inside Lebanon and handed them over to the Lebanese police, does this make a difference to the legality of the capture/kidnap?
I'm not really for a debate on it, I was just considering use of language. I too think it's telling that the story has changed.
Do you have links to the articles about the tank? I've been poking around, but haven't been able to find anything about that.
Thanks!
Post a Comment